End of Life Care
Many states and counties are reeling from the increased expenses to continue providing healthcare to an aging inmate population. As the average age of US inmates increases, chronic disease and cancers escalate.
In an earlier post I talked about the basics of the aging inmate population. News articles pop up almost weekly about state correctional systems struggling with rising health care costs due to elder inmates and chronic disease.
A growing segment of the aging inmate population is those with cancer and other terminal illnesses requiring specialized care. Recently I spoke with Susan Loeb, PhD, RN, a nurse researcher implementing NINR granted funded research on end of life care in the PA Prison System [Correctional Nursing Today Radio Show]. Her research will lead to a toolkit for facilities to implement to develop a hospice program. It has been reported that at least 70 correctional facilities in the US have some type of hospice program with over ½ of them including inmate caregiver programs. Some facilities are partnering with community hospice services to provide needed staff education and specialty resources. Those with inmate caregiver programs have seen a positive impact on the attitudes and culture of both the inmate and custody community. An independent film was created following 3 dying inmates at the Kansas State Penitentiary. Edgar Berans, film producer, sites multiple positive outcomes of the program in a recent radio interview.
Some progressive correctional systems such as Washington State and California have already created assisted-living and long-term care facilities within their prison systems to accommodate these needs. Elderly inmates can fall victim to predatory younger inmates and require equipment such as wheelchairs and canes difficult to incorporate into a standard correctional system. Equipment of this type can be used as weapons if not properly managed.
Elder inmates also require environmental adaptations not usual in the correctional setting. They are unable to climb to top bunks and can become rattled or agitated by noise stress in prison barracks. Disabled inmates are challenged by stair or are unable to stand for long periods in the various lines that are a normal part of prison life.
How is your correctional system handling inmates at the end of life? Weigh in using the comment section of this post.
Transgender Inmates: He Said, She Said
THE SITUATION: You’re working medical screening for new detainees at a large urban jail. Your next case arrives for assessment with make-up and bright female clothing, although you also see male-pattern facial hair and muscle structure. What do you do?
Transgender individuals are over-represented in the inmate population. If you work in corrections, you are likely to come face-to-face with your attitudes and emotions about these individuals. Nursing ethical principles require those of us in the profession to provide nursing care with concern and respect for human dignity, no matter the life choices the individual has made.
Transgenders (also called trans or cross-genders) are individuals with an incongruity between their felt gender and their anatomic gender. The majority are male and can have a DSMIV diagnosis of gender identity disorder (GID). Your inmate-patient may be in the midst of hormonal therapy or have partial or complete sex reassignment surgery (SRS).
Conversation
Your first concern is how to address the person. Do you use the term ‘He’ or ‘She’? Though it may seem trivial, your sensitivity in this area will establish needed repoire. Often you can avoid using gender terms or you can clearly see which term to use. For example, the individual above is likely to desire to be referred to as ‘she’, especially if the clothing involves a dress or skirt. When in doubt, your best option is to ask the individual how they would like to be addressed. Let them be in control of this small issue – control of so much else is gone. Attempt to be as matter-of-fact and non-judgmental as possible in all interactions.
Destination
Unless your system has special facilities for the transgender inmate, such as the new 30-bed transgender Italian prison, administration will need policies in place to determine housing designation. This is a vulnerable population requiring some type of protective housing. The nature of the condition predisposes the inmate to a higher potential of assault or in-custody violence. In addition, those with GID are more likely to be depressed, suicidal or self-injurers. Keep this in mind when assessing these inmates for any health conditions.
Change Management
What if the person is in the midst of hormonal therapy or SRS? What responsibilities are there for maintaining or continuing escalation of therapy? Policies regarding transgender treatment differ among state and county systems. Investigate the policy at your facility before you need to use it. Discuss the situation with your manager and medical director.
In a recent survey of correction system policies about transgender treatment, the majority of responding facilities had policies for the continuation of hormonal therapy, at least at the current level. Abrupt discontinuation of hormonal therapy can lead to physical and psychological side effects and should be avoided. Many facilities will use a ‘freeze-frame’ approach which continues the current therapy but does not escalate or advance the gender-change process.
Autocastration – Medical Emergency
Be aware that disturbed individuals may resort to autocastration or autopenectomy to reduce testosterone levels. The elasticity of the testicular arteries allows them to retract into the perineum making it very difficult to staunch the flow. Emergency transport, critical care and blood transfusion may be necessary.
More Resources on Transgender Treatment
Transgender Guidelines from NCCHC
Is My Patient Faking It?
Unfortunately, correctional nurses must be wary of a variety of motives behind inmate-patients seeking medical or mental health treatment. Malingering is defined as the intentional falsification or exaggeration of symptoms for external motives or secondary gain. There is a high incidence of malingering in jails and prisons. A reported 20% of mental illness in corrections is malingering.
Reasons to Fake Illness
There are many reasons an inmate may fake a mental or medical condition. The first that usually comes to mind is to procure drugs. Separated from preferred mood enhancers such as alcohol or barbiturates, inmates seek other avenues of relief. Seroquel (Suzie-Q) is an example of a current favorite that may be sought through feigning mental illness or psychosis.
However, in the prison system secondary gain can include other, more benign desires such as special creams, lotions, or supplements. One prison system I worked in had a problem with overuse of nutritional supplements (such as Ensure). It was discovered that it brought a high price on the facility black market as bodybuilders thought it would help them bulk up.
Illness can also bring desirable housing locations or work release. Trips to hospital or specialists provide avenues for escape attempts or a chance for a ‘vacation’.
Some inmates may exaggerate symptoms because they think they will not get attention in the system unless they are in severe distress. A true medical condition exists but not as intense as it is being portrayed.
A Nurse’s Best Response
A good principle to follow is to “Trust no one but give everyone the benefit of the doubt”. This is key to maintaining the right level of professional objectivity, writes Melissa Caldwell, PhD, in a recent article for the Society of Correctional Physicians. Here are some tips to help you maintain objectivity in the face of potential malingering:
- Do a complete nursing assessment. Do not disregard any medical complaint as faking. Always respond.
- Thoroughly document all objective and subjective data. Repeated questioning now or later may reveal inconsistencies or validate findings.
- Review prior documentation and history for comparison or evidence of drug-seeking behaviors.
- Portray empathy. You do, in fact, want to get to the bottom of the issue and provide correct treatment.
- Avoid giving clues that will make them a better malingerer.
- Err on the side of safety. Provide a period of observation (such as in the infirmary or holding area).
- Always question yourself. After 3 false ‘chest pain’ complaints – this could be the real one.
Remember, determining malingering is not a nursing function. Assessment, referral or treatment based on protocol are nursing actions. As in the game of baseball – play your position.
Why It‘s Important
Getting to the bottom of potential malingering is important in order to eliminate the waste of valuable resources and time that could be more effectively used elsewhere. Correctional nurses can help eliminate inmate malingering by taking careful histories and assessments, documenting responses for comparisons over time, and collaborating with medical and mental health staff to develop appropriate interventions.
More Resources on Malingering
Lockup Doc http://lockupdoc.com/tag/malingering
All Nurse: http://allnurses.com/correctional-nursing/print256963.html
CorrDoc: http://www.corrdocs.org/framework.phppagetype=newsstory&newsid=12160&bgn=2
Lawofficer.com: http://www.lawofficer.com/news-and-articles/columns/Kulbarsh/malingering.html
Journal of Family Practice: http://www.jfponline.com/Pages.asp?AID=2821#1
Psychopharmacology: http://www.acbhcs.org/Psychopharmacology/2005/June2005.pdf
Responding to Inmate Sexual Assault & Prison Rape
The statistics on prison rape are shocking. According to the 2007 Department of Justice study, 4.5% of all state and federal inmates experienced at least one incident of sexual victimization. That is nearly 1 in 20 inmates. My first reaction to the information was to assume this was inmate on inmate victimization, but this is only part of it. More assault is reported involving facility staff (2.9%) than inmate perpetrators (2.1%).
The Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) was passed by the US Congress in 2003 and legislates actions to be taken by corrections personnel to prevent and respond to sexual assaults. PREA also established a Commission to monitor the process of preventing rape in the country’s jails and prisons. How can correctional nurses respond?
What is Considered Prison Rape?
Any unwanted sexual contact between inmates is considered prison rape. This can include fondling of genitalia or even instilling fear of rape. It does not necessarily have to be full penetration and does not require force to be defined as prison rape.
There is an even higher standard for staff on inmate sexual contact. ANY sexual contact between a staff and inmate – even if consensual – is considered prison rape and can be prosecuted. Be clear for yourself and your work-mates – there is NO permissible level of sexual contact with an inmate. Staff members have been prosecuted and sentenced for writing sexually explicit letters to inmates. A recent example of progression into illegal sexual contact is described in this article.
Who is a Likely Rape Candidate?
As you might expect, studies confirm that the likely inmate sexual assault victim is young, a first time offender, and of small build. In fact, juveniles in adult prisons have a 5 times higher chance of being a rape victim. If you have juveniles in your facility, keep this in mind when you are providing care. Be on the look-out for indications of having been assaulted. Some prisons automatically take protective actions for any juveniles who have received adult sentencing. This is also true for transgender, mentally ill, or developmentally disabled inmates. Be alert when assessing and evaluating any of these categories of inmates.
Impacting Healthcare
Every one of our inmate-patients is at risk for sexual assault or rape and may seek medical treatment for it. We need to be alert to the possibility and ready to respond. Here are a few clinical situations to consider
- An inmate arrives in sick call with a vague complaint – she is depressed, nauseous, agitated, or exhibit other traumatic stress responses
- While working in the segregation unit, you see a generally compliant inmate break rules toward the end of his seg stay, seemingly intent on extending his time
- A young inmate begins covering himself with feces. After mental health evaluation it is discovered that he uses this as a protective mechanism against repeated rapes by his cell mate
Action You Can Take
Be familiar with your DOC procedures before you are confronted with a sexual assault situation. That way you will know what mechanisms to put into action. For example, you may need to inform the shift commander. Many places have a sexual assault response team consisting of a mental health provider, law enforcement professional and medical provider.
Document clearly the statements made by the individual. Allow them to vent without moving into investigative mode and asking questions. Asking questions too early may cause a victim to retreat and close down.
Arrange for a sexual assault evaluation, including a rape kit if the report is within 96 hours of the assault. A specially trained individual should perform this function as forensic evidence will be obtained. In some facilities arrangements must be made to send the inmate-patient out to a hospital emergency room for this procedure.
Arrange frequent mental health follow-up for post traumatic stress responses.
Unfortunately, not all healthcare staff, correctional officers or administrative staff consider sexual assault an important issue. You may encounter conflict in your attempts to advocate for the victim. Be reminded, and remind your corrections colleagues, that being aware of the situation and not responding is both unconstitutional (Eighth Amendment) and illegal (PREA). In addition, as nurses, we have a moral obligation to act in a rape situation. Sexual assault is not a part of the punishment. We need to respond compassionately as any prudent nurse would in a community situation.
Have you have an experience with a prison rape situation? Share your story in the comments section.
Ethical Dilemmas in Correctional Nursing
I recently had the opportunity to be interviewed for the KindEthics Radio Program. We had an interesting discussion about ethical dilemmas unique to nurses (and doctors) working in corrections.
Basis of Ethical Care
Two basic principles of ethical care are beneficence (acting only for the benefit of the patient) and nonmalfeasance (do no harm to the patient). In the course of working in a security environment, an ethical dilemma can arise when the goals of custody administration seem to conflict with these principles. A code of ethics specific to correctional healthcare was created by the American Correctional Health Services Association (ACHSA). Lets look at just a few examples of ethical dilemmas that may be encountered.
Body Cavity Searches
Healthcare staff may be asked to perform searches of rectal or genital areas for contraband items such as drugs or weapons. This action would not be of benefit to the patient and has no health purpose. Professionals may have concerns that these searches done by custody might injure or harm the patient. However, there is general agreement that body cavity searches should not be performed by healthcare staff that have a patient-provider relationship with the inmate.
Collecting Forensic Information
Along the same lines, requests can be made to assist with collecting forensic evidence to be used against the inmate, such as blood tests, DNA analysis or psychological evaluations. Providing such services would constitute a conflict of interest for the care providers working in the facility. Resources outside the facility medical unit should be accessed to provide these services.
Executions
Fortunately most states executing the death penalty have moved to the use of outside providers for monitoring and initiating lethal injection. All authorities agree that participation in executions is inappropriate for healthcare staff with a patient-provider relationship to the inmate population.
Hunger Strikes
Ethical conflict can develop regarding treatment choices during hunger strikes. Most certainly, monitoring the health status of a striking inmate would be beneficent and nonmalfesent care. The dilemma begins if healthcare staff are asked to force feed (tube feed) the starving inmate. Practitioners are mixed on a response to this request. Although there is no clear consensus, the ACHSA has adopted a position statement advocating force feeding in some situations. The Federal Bureau of Prisons has a program statement on hunger strikes indicating force-feeding is a medical decision based on emergent life threatening criteria.
Inmate Discipline
Involvement in inmate discipline can also result in an ethical dilemma. For the most part, healthcare staff should not be involved in disciplinary action or disciplinary committees determining actions in the facility in which they work. However, involvement becomes necessary when a staff member has witnessed or is the receiver of wrongful action. It is appropriate to provide factual objective testimony in order to maintain security in the facility and the safety of other inmates and staff members.
Patient Confidentiality
Healthcare providers often get queries from custody staff about the health condition of particular inmates usually related to infectious diseases or mental health. Information can also be spread through knowledge of the type of services provided to specific inmates or special needs issues (bottom bunk, food privileges, etc). In these situations it is important to carefully share needed information which will minimally jeopardize patient confidentiality. The specific need can be shared (bottom bunk) without sharing the diagnosis (epilepsy).
What other ethical dilemmas might be experienced in correctional practice?
Shackling Inmates in Labor? What’s Up with That?
Shackling laboring inmates has been an issue for some time in corrections and is getting press due to coverage in New York. Last week they became the sixth state to ban the use of shackles during labor except is special situations. The ACLU and other prison watch groups have been actively pursuing a change in this corrections practice. It is one of many ethical dilemmas correctional nurses become involved with. Unlike in hospitals, healthcare is secondary to security and safety in the running of the correctional facility. The Department of Corrections and custody officers can have a very different perspective on any given situation from the healthcare providers. A ‘Command and Control’ attitude can be quite challenging to deal with.
Shackles are for Outside the Walls
Some clarification is necessary to the uninitiated. The news articles make it appear that the women are INSIDE the prison giving birth and being shackled. Unless referring to the few prison hospitals around the country, what is really happening is that the women have been transported to the hospital to give birth. They are therefore outside the security perimeter of the prison and there are standard precautions in place to decrease the chance of escape and to reduce the need for a large number of officers to attend them. Those standard precautions include handcuffs and shackles.
Standard Security Procedure
Now those of us who have given birth know that it is highly unlikely that a women in true labor is going to have the wherewithal to evade an officer in the L&D Unit and escape into the community. However, inmates have been known to be very creative in their escape plans. No corrections officer wants to be the one on duty when an escape takes place. Therefore,the custody officer is going to use standard procedures (IE shackles) unless special directives are issued – thus the need for specific policy to be in place regarding the laboring inmate in the community.
Advocating for Change
I’m not really an advocate for legislation for everything so the idea of getting legislation about this in all 50 states seems a bit much to me. However, the Federal Bureau of Prisons and 5 other states so far have specific policy or legislation allowing the laboring inmate to be free of shackles. The visibility of the New York situation may speed the adoption throughout the country – that is a good thing. The Rebecca Project for Human Rights has also taken up the call and been instrumental in facilitating the New York State legislation. A listing of specific state by state information was recently posted by the Crime Reporter.
Can Correctional Nurses Care? – Part II

Caring for and about the inmate population has a variety of challenges to overcome. Besides the dilemma of caring for a criminal, there is the issue of showing care and concern to this population.
‘Warm and Fuzzy’ is Not the Way to Care for Inmates
Many healthcare environments allow, and even encourage, physical expressions of caring such as touching the arm, patting the shoulder, or holding a hand during a painful procedure. These are not appropriate caring behaviours in the corrections setting. These actions in the correctional setting can frequently be sexualized and misinterpreted as making advances. Touching the patient is limited to necessary procedures and treatments.
Firm, Fair and Consistent
Verbal interactions with inmate patients require similar boundaries. Idle chat or asking personal questions which may come naturally in other care settings are inappropriate in corrections. Being firm, fair and consistent in all communication with the patient reduces misinterpretation. A goodly amount of inmates have socially deviant or manipulative behavior patterns. This group of inmates will prey on staff members with insecurities or poor self-esteem. Being ever vigilant to deflect these behaviors can establish the necessary boundaries for good nursing care.
Caring by Protecting from Themselves
Another avenue of caring in correctional nursing is though protecting the inmate from breaking custody rules. Establishing and maintaining barriers in the care environment prevents access to contraband or opportunity for theft. Keeping narcotics, sharps, syringes, and dental equipment under constant observation or locked away prevents the inmate from taking a foolish action that could cause harm to themselves or others.
Caring by Advocating within the Custody Environment
My final thought is that correctional nurses care through advocacy for inmate healthcare needs within the custody environment. I have great respect for my custody colleagues – they provide protection and safety 24/7 in very challenging situations. Sometimes the goals of security and healthcare conflict. Depending on the situation, advocating for a patient’s health need can be percieved as counter to the immediate security needs or the general goals of the facility. Challenging the status quo in these circumstances is an act of caring.
What other ways do you think correctional nurses care for their patients? Leave a comment
Can Correctional Nurses Care? – Part I
The American Nurses Association defines nursing as
…the protection, promotion, and optimization of health and abilities, prevention of illness and injury, alleviation of suffering through the diagnosis and treatment of human response, and advocacy in the care of individuals, families, communities, and populations (emphasis added)
Quite a mouthful, and quite a challenge to deliver in a correctional setting. Some may ask if nurses working in corrections can truly ‘care’ for their inmate-patients, considering the circumstances for which they are incarcerated. Thus is the generation of several ethical dilemmas for this nursing specialty.
Providing Care to Criminals
A major challenge for any correctional nurse is to see the inmate-patient as a human being in need of healthcare at this point in their lives without regard for their conviction. Just as in any other healthcare setting, the patient does not recieve care based on the goodness or badness of their life actions or choices. In other settings, the nurse is not aware of past law violations of patients - whether they cheat on their taxes, run red lights, or are cruel to neighbors or pets. Delivery of quality nursing care is a goal to strive for no matter the characteristics of the patient.
In fact, I recommend that nurses working in corrections make a point of not knowing the reason for the patient’s incarceration – it can only cloud your vision for delivering good care. That does not include level of security, by the way. Always be aware of the level of security for the facility or area in which you are practicing. Safety is of first concern and must be attended to at all times.
What do you think? Are you a correctional nurse or could you be one? What would the challenge be in caring for a criminal?





