Be sure to check out our integration with The Correctional Nurse Educator and Nursing Behind the Wall
The Pitfalls of Empty Phrases in Health Record Documentation
By Lori Roscoe
In the world of healthcare, meticulous documentation is the cornerstone of effective patient care. Every word written in a health record carries significant weight, providing a snapshot of the patient’s condition, guiding subsequent care, and influencing treatment plans. However, amidst the quest for precision, there’s a prevalent yet overlooked issue: the use of seemingly meaningful, but ultimately empty, phrases.
Let’s look at three commonly used phrases – “will continue to monitor,” “no acute distress,” and “within normal limits” – that often find their way into health records, and discuss their shortcomings and advocate for more precise and meaningful documentation practices.
“Will continue to monitor”
This phrase, learned and adopted as a protective measure in nursing practice, often lacks the necessary specifics to be truly effective. Monitoring is a crucial aspect of patient care, but stating an intention to monitor without specifying what, how, and how often is like painting an incomplete picture. Take, for instance, a patient at risk for withdrawal. Rather than a vague commitment to monitor, precise documentation would entail specifics: “Continue to monitor every shift with a CIWA evaluation per the Withdrawal Protocol.” This clarity not only signifies responsibility for patient care, but also ensures a clear plan for subsequent evaluations and actions.
“No acute distress”
While seemingly straightforward, this phrase lacks universal definition unless it is described within an agency’s policy or procedure. Rather than relying on a generic statement, documenting the patient’s presentation and behavior provides a clearer picture. Describing observable signs – a steady gait, verbalizing with appropriate responses, or specific symptoms like severe pain – paints a vivid picture of the patient’s state at that time, enabling a more comprehensive understanding of their condition. These indicators can then be used in subsequent evaluations to determine if the patient’s condition is improving, deteriorating, or staying the same.
“Within normal limits”
This phrase, commonly used to indicate a patient’s health parameters, falls short without defining what constitutes “normal.” Precision in healthcare documentation necessitates clarity, like stating whether measurements fall within expected norms based on protocols or individual patient history. For instance, a pulse of 104 beats per minute might be within a patient’s expected parameters but doesn’t fall within the general “normal” range. Detailing past vital signs and patient history allows for a more nuanced understanding, aiding in tailored treatment plans.
The intention behind these phrases isn’t flawed; it’s the lack of specificity that poses a challenge. Precision matters because it impacts subsequent care and treatment plans. Each word in a health record should serve the purpose of accurately conveying the patient’s condition at the time of evaluation to ensure seamless continuity of care. Ultimately, precise documentation isn’t an exercise in nitpicking; it’s a fundamental component of responsible healthcare practice. By getting rid of empty phrases in favor of specific, descriptive language, healthcare professionals can ensure that each entry in a health record contributes meaningfully to comprehensive patient care.