Inmate Dexter was found cheeking his psyche meds. The facility has a blanket policy that all narcotics are crushed and, in addition, all pills are crushed for patients found to divert their medications. This morning he is to receive Effexor XR, Ery-Tab, and Kaletra. Now what?
Some correctional systems require that medications be crushed to avoid diversion. There are few studies about this practice and many concerns. Besides the increased time needed to crush medications, some formulations are not absorbed correctly once crushed. In particular, time release capsules and slow-release tablets are based on the medication remaining in the manufactured format for correct absorption. Other medications are caustic to the intestinal system and require enteric coating to avoid adverse effects. Thus, pharmacy experts strongly advise against crushing both time-released and enteric coated preparations. The ISMP provides a detailed listing of medications that should not be crushed.
Little is available on the practice and outcome of crushing medications in the correctional setting but much can be learned from observation of nursing practice in long-term care. One study in Australia found many medications being crushed with communal crushing equipment and multiple medications being crushed at the same time. Both practices can cause adverse effects or expose patients to an allergic reaction according to experts.
Crushing Injury: Are You Helping or Harming When You Crush Pills?
Harm to Patient – Harm to Nurse
Other concerns with indiscriminate crushing of medications is the possibility of teeth staining and irritation of the mouth, esophagus, and stomach lining. Binders or other substances included in the tablet formation may be needed to buffer Ph or other irritating qualities of the medication. The erythromycin (Ery-Tab) that Inmate Dexter is to receive is enteric coated for this purpose.
Opening capsules or crushing medications can be harmful to staff, as well as patients. Exposure to active ingredients may be carcinogenic and harmful to an unborn fetus (teratogenic or fetotoxic). Sensitive individuals may have an allergic response. In the example above, Kaletra should not be crushed and a pregnant staff member should not come in contact with the active ingredients.
Harm to the Treatment Plan
The effectiveness of medication can be altered or eliminated by crushing. For example, medications that are sublingual or effervescent should not be crushed for this reason.
Medication toxicity can result when sustained-release or extended release tablets are crushed or capsules opened. The patient may receive the entire dose immediately rather than over a longer time period, as intended by the formulation. Inmate Dexter’s Effexor XR is such a medication.
Sometimes you can immediately identify these danger medications by their prefix or suffix. Common controlled-delivery indicators are:
-
-
- CC
- CD
- CR
- ER
- LA
- Retard
- SA
- Slo-
- SR
- XL
- XR
- XT
-
Time Pressed
Crushing medication properly is a time-consuming operation that can increase the time-stress of medication administration, thus increasing error risk. So, medication crushing should not be required indiscriminately but used judiciously when necessary for the patient and patient community’s safety. For example, some settings limit crushing to highly abused medications such as psychotropics and narcotics. Other settings require crushing for individual patients who have been identified as diverting their medications like Inmate Dexter.
Avoiding Crushing Injury
Based on the literature (also here, here, and here) the following safety measure should be considered when crushing medications.
- Establish a list of common medications that should not be crushed.
- Limit crushing to high risk medications or high risk patients to reduce error potential and increase medication administration efficiency.
- Require the prescriber to order crushing as the mode of PO administration.
- Require pharmacist oversight of crushing (through the order) as a double check that medications ordered for crushing are appropriate for this delivery method.
- Transcribe crushing as the route of administration onto the MAR.
- Make every attempt to obtain the medication in liquid formation to avoid crushing.
- Only crush medications with approved devices. Use a fully self-contained device. Avoid mortar and pestle or twist devices that need cleaning between doses.
- Use individual packets with communal crushing devices to eliminate the potential for mixing medications.
- Do not make a slurry of combined medications. Each crushed medication should be administered separately to avoid incompatibilities.
- Mix crushed medications with water and not food (like applesauce) or other liquids (like juice) that might interact with the medication.
Another good practice is to eliminate highly abused medications from the formulary; replacing them with an appropriate substitute of lesser abuse potential. Quetiapine (Seroquel), gabapentin (Neurontin), and bupropion (Wellbutrin) have been eliminated as options from some jail formularies due to the high level of abuse in the particular inmate population. While this may reduce abuse, it is important to have alternative medications on formulary to use when therapy is needed for an actual patient condition.
What about Inmate Dexter?
Inmate Dexter’s medications were delayed while the med nurse consulted with the pharmacy about options for his daily medications. Although not the most convenient solution; it was the safest and best practice. Later that day she set up a nurse sick call appointment for him to discuss the reason for his medication diversion. The root cause needs investigated. For example: Is it because he doesn’t want to take the med? Is it a medication that someone else is pressuring him for? Is it something he thinks he can sell? Armed with this information, she plans to discuss the situation with the provider to see if there are any alternatives such as medication discontinuation or exchange.
What do you do when pills need crushing in your practice setting? Share your procedure and best practices in the comments section of this post.
Photo Credit: © Rob Byron – Fotolia.com
Stephanie Madison says
I work in one of the CA Department of State Hospitals (DSH) forensic psychiatric hospitals. My hospital has a prototype unit caked the Intensive Substance Recovery Unit. This is the first of its kind in the DSH. All medications are crushed with the exception of the enteric coated and time released as well as some HIV meds. We have circumvented the crushing issue by getting as many medications as possible in liquid form. Narcotics and other drugs like Benadryl are also prohibited. We have other processes created to deal with patient’s that need narcotics for chronic and acute pain management. Many of our patients did not have a drug problem until they came to our hospital. Most of the dangers to staff and patients stem from behavior from detoxing and wheeling and dealing to get drugs. Even with crushing, we have checks in place. We have a “Club Med” that is very structured. Patients have two mouth checks as part of the process and then they are timed to sit in club med with a staff checking them in and out. This requires special training by staff and it is a lot of work. We have had success with discharges once the patient has earned their way out through intensive 12-step work, behavior, graduating to different levels with increased responsibility and freedom. I agree about the toxicity issue which has not really been addressed. Since most of our meds come in plastic, not bubble, but plastic squares with plastic like a plastic shopping bag, we are able to crush them in that, open it, and administer it that way. We have consistently had the lowest incident management numbers in the hospital which I attribute to the lack of drugs available and the staff involvement. This kind of operation requires specialized training for hand picked staff and commitment from that staff to the program.
Lorry Schoenly says
Stephanie: It sounds like your unit really has it together – kudos! If you have any procedures you would like to share with others (and are permitted to) please email them to me at lorry@correctionalnurse.net and I’ll upload them for the benefit of others.
Stephanie Madison says
Hi Lorry,
Thanks for the complement to my unit. We are trying but have a long way to go. The success of a substance abuse recovery unit will be imperative in other units being implemented in the state system. Recovery skills are the backbone of what many of the incarcerated need. There is a lot of resistance when they first arrive on the unit. Down the road, most of them see the light and understand the need for recovery in their lives. It is a package deal as far as behavior, toxic family, and toxic friends that can undermine their success after discharge. I will give some thought to overall processes on the unit and write up a brief synopsis to send you. The biggest obstacle is admitting there is a problem. The biggest drug entry system is the visitors center and the mail. Focus on improving processes related to those two systems would solve a lot of problems. Next would be the staff. Thank you for all your work in this area. Your work gives credibility and honor to correctional nursing.
Lori Roscoe says
Hi Lorry,
Thank you for sharing this very important, and little thought of, issue in medication administration in corrections!
Hi Stephanie,
Thank you for sharing about your unit. It sounds like a very innovative program that deserves recognition (and replication!). I am very interested in the processes and procedures you have implemented to get this program, and I hope that you are able to share some “pearls” with Lorry so that we can all benefit from your successes. Your comment regarding the fact that “many of our patients did not have drug problems until they came to our hospital” intrigued me – to what do you attribute this new-found drug problem (and what exactly is the problem that they develop? Dependence?)
Again thanks to Lorry for the topic, and to you for sharing your good work! I do look forward to learning more.
Stephanie Madison says
Hi Lori….yes the program is innovative but I take no credit for it other than supporting it and carrying out the principles and rules. A social worker at our hospital created and implemented the program along with the hospital medical administrator. The drug dependency comment, I believe, is a common problem in forensics. Contraband street drugs brought in by mail or the visitor’s center which leads to the beginning of drug dependency, seeking of drugs, wheeling and dealing and prostituting to obtain drugs. On our unit I have seen substitutions used to replicate the neurological response that begins when the drugs are being prepped for administration, i.e. cutting up cocaine, heating up heroin. The Haight-Ashbury Free Clinic did a great educational film I saw years ago showing the neurological response to an addict just watching cocaine being chopped up with a credit card. That is where the addiction lies as well as the entire aspect of wheeling and dealing. I will try to put together some of the characteristics of the unit to share. Mainly it is a lot of rules with dedicated staff committed to upholding and carrying out the rules. Most of us have some experience or exposure either through recovery, or in my case, my sister was an addict for many years before passing away. I work in psych forensics, but I would imagine we experience the same challenges in regards to inmates appetite for street drugs or prescription drugs that fit the bill.